|
FULL GUIDELINE:
5 August 2003
The bounds of this concerns a "manufacturing"
entity, meaning a complex process demanding raw
materials and delivering product in the hands of
the end user. In control terminology, it is a
network with a topology consisting of a
multiplicity of nodes and links. Today, in
business terms, we recognise a node as being
characterised by a materials planning
process (e.g. MRP), and an elemental link
as being a data connection between two nodes in
the network.


This is the
so-called single factory concept. Today's
business systems can in fact perform this
inherently, within a single enterprise, since
they have access to all the data relevant to
that enterprise. What they do not have today is
unrestricted access to the data from external
enterprises.
If it is possible
to identify the necessary information flow
needed across an elemental link between two
different proprietary MRP processes, then the
integration of a cooperating two-enterprise
supply link can be achieved, and by extension,
potentially the relevant supply network.
Using
this premise, the requirement for
MRP-to-MRP bi-directional information flow can
be standardised and is identified. This is
nothing more than the supply & demand situation
and inventory status/movement, by product.

The next stage is
defining how to implement the elemental 2
linked-nodes model in reality.
Again, any node may
be connected, using multiple links, to other
nodes. This means that for practical, commercial
and security reasons, we have been forced to
restrict out partners to use data in the nodes
which has been limited and filtered for that
specific link.
The filter on the
buyers side is a procurement system, which
selects the data relating only to seller at the
other end of the link.
The filter on the
sellers side is a planning system, which selects
the data relating only to the buyer at the other
end of the link.
Typically these
filters are very conservative, and block access
for the other partner to additional information
in that node, used for the MRP computations, and
which would allow optimization of the overall
process. It is for this reason that until quite
recently , buying procurement was limited to
issuing short term purchase orders and seller
planning only to providing a best case match to
these.
Business liability was 100%; any changes to
demand/supply by either party required
case-by-case negotiation.
What has now been
realised is that by making much more information
available to the external partner,
very impressive cost benefits can be
realised, as the MRP systems become closer
linked and optimisation of each elemental supply
link is achieved.
The movement of data between partners
increases massively, which can only be
implemented with a very reliable and resilient
data link.
Business liability
is now shared between the partners.
Evidently these
2-node joint systems between partners should be
standardised for maximum re-use and efficient
implementation with all other partners. Until
this is achieved, the individual links are
implemented according to bilaterally agreed
"service models". These are part of the dynamic
process of gaining the confidence and building
the capabilities of each partner, to move
towards a solution of transparent linking and
ultimately the "single factory".
Even then it is not
finished, because we really need to optimize the
relevant
network and not each individual link
which makes up the supply network.
As outsourcing increases (in order to
optimize other costs), there is no longer a
unique "supply chain", but many different links
which are controlled and
related by data movements in adjacent
links in the supply network. Examples are
the use of contract manufacturing, remote
warehousing, purchasing from distributors, etc.
The beneficial effects of exchanging forecast
and consumption data with related up-stream
nodes is a well known academic exercise used in
training materials managers.
This whole supply chain process should be a
co-operative industry effort and can only happen
if the overall objectives are understood by all
parties, and adherence to agreed standards is
appreciated and implemented. Customization is a
temptation which has to be avoided as far as is
possible.
|